|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 21:02:05 GMT -5
Post by 38thdoe on Jul 27, 2011 21:02:05 GMT -5
I put tentative orders for kill on Baidol and 101. Feel free to change.
|
|
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 21:03:43 GMT -5
Post by MrTLicious on Jul 27, 2011 21:03:43 GMT -5
This went really well. Peccavi totally took over the vote. And now taya and I look totally separate. Brilliant.
|
|
taya
New Member
Posts: 46
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 21:19:02 GMT -5
Post by taya on Jul 27, 2011 21:19:02 GMT -5
I agree that 101 is a good target.
For our second kill, we have Baidol there for now but weren't we also considering INANTP? 38thdoe you didn't really explain why you would rather Baidol than INANTP.
|
|
taya
New Member
Posts: 46
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 22:17:59 GMT -5
Post by taya on Jul 27, 2011 22:17:59 GMT -5
See, Baidol voted late and followed the current bandwagon. He's pretty quiet in the thread but since he messaged me it implies that he's talking to people behind the scenes. Maybe he's trying to keep a low profile.
I don't know anything about Just Cause which is the game that he claims to be.
On the other hand INANTP is being pretty talkative (perhaps more than usual?). He voted for Langly who is confirmed village since he was guarded. His vote isn't necessarily proof that he's not a special though because he may just want to get people talking.
Maybe I'll keep the kill order on Baidol unless someone speaks up.
|
|
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 22:47:34 GMT -5
Post by MrTLicious on Jul 27, 2011 22:47:34 GMT -5
Yes, but the vote for Langly was after the taya bandwagon, so I'm not sure what to take from that. I'm actually favoring a Baidol/INANTP kill vote at this moment, though 101 is almost as good to me.
|
|
taya
New Member
Posts: 46
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 22:54:04 GMT -5
Post by taya on Jul 27, 2011 22:54:04 GMT -5
If you want to change it, you can.
Although there's something about 101, I don't really have any good evidence that he's special.
|
|
|
Day 2
Jul 27, 2011 23:01:33 GMT -5
Post by MrTLicious on Jul 27, 2011 23:01:33 GMT -5
No, I'm good with that. The INANTP might have been too obvious as an attempt to imply Langly.
|
|